Incident Response Frameworks
The two most well-respected IR frameworks were developed by NIST and SANS to give IT teams a foundation to build their incident response plans on. Below are steps of each framework:
NIST Incident Response Steps
- Step #1: Preparation
- Step #2: Detection and Analysis
- Step #3: Containment, Eradication and Recovery
- Step #4: Post-Incident Activity
SANS Incident Response Steps
- Step #1: Preparation
- Step #2: Identification
- Step #3: Containment
- Step #4: Eradication
- Step #5: Recovery
- Step #6: Lessons Learned
When we compare the NIST and SANS frameworks side-by-side, you'll see the components are almost identical, but differ slighting in their wording and grouping. The biggest difference lies with Step 3, where NIST believes that containment, eradication, and recovery overlap – meaning you shouldn't wait to contain all threats before beginning to eradicate them.
Which Framework is Better?
Some debate which framework is better, but it really comes down to a matter of preference and your organization’s resources. Both come with a comprehensive checklist for your team to follow and get started. This article expands upon the four steps of the NIST Framework, and breaks down what each means for your incident response plan.
Step #1: Preparation
No organization can spin up an effective incident response on a moment’s notice. A plan must be in place to both prevent and respond to events.
Define the CSIRT (Computer Security Incident Response Team)
To act quickly and completely while an incident is unfolding, everyone on the CSIRT needs to know their responsibilities and the decisions that are theirs to make.
The CSIRT should include a cross section of business and technical experts with the authority to take action in support of the business. Members should include representatives from management, technical, legal, and communications disciplines, as well as security committee liaisons. All departments affected by an incident should be in the loop and everyone should have a decision matrix to guide their actions during and after the incident.
The plan should also define who is in charge and who has the authority to make certain critical decisions. Those aren’t things to figure out--let alone argue over--in the heat of the moment.
Develop and update a plan
Ensure plans and other supporting documents exist and are updated periodically to remain current. All relevant personnel should have access to the parts of the plan that pertain to their responsibilities and should be alerted when the plan is revised. There should be a feedback loop that is enacted after every significant incident in order to improve the plan continuously.
Acquire and Maintain the Proper Infrastructure and Tools
Have the capabilities to detect and investigate incidents, as well as to collect and preserve evidence. To determine if an attacker is in your environment, it’s critical that you have endpoint security technology that provides total visibility into your endpoints and collects incident data.
Without the right tools, and processes to guide their use, you’ll be ill-equipped to investigate how attackers are accessing your environment, how to mitigate an attacker’s existing access, or how to prevent future access.
Always Improve Skills and Support Training
Ensure the IR team has the appropriate skills and training. This includes exercising the IR plan from time to time. It also includes staffing the IR team, with either in-house staff or through a third-party provider, to accommodate the time away from the job necessary in order to maintain certifications and leverage other educational opportunities.
Possess Up-to-Date Threat Intelligence Capabilities
Threat intelligence capabilities help an organization understand the kinds of threats it should be prepared to respond to. Threat intelligence should integrate seamlessly into endpoint protection and use automated incident investigations to speed breach response. Automation enables a more comprehensive analysis of threats in just minutes, not hours, so an organization can outpace advanced persistent threats (APTs) with smarter responses.
Step #2. Detection & Analysis
The second phase of IR is to determine whether an incident occurred, its severity, and its type. NIST outlines five steps within this overall phase:
- Pinpoint signs of an incident (precursors and indicators): Precursors and indicators are specific signals that an incident is either about to occur, or has already occurred.
- Analyze the discovered signs: Once identified, the IR team has to determine if a precursor or indicator is part of an attack or if it is a false positive.
- Incident documentation: If the signal proves valid, the IR team must begin documenting all facts in relation to the incident and continue logging all actions taken throughout the process.
- Incident prioritization: NIST designates this step as the most critical decision point in the IR process. The IR team can’t simply prioritize incidents on a first come, first serve basis. Instead, they must score incidents on the impact it will have on the business functionality, the confidentiality of affected information, and the recoverability of the incident.
- Incident notification: After an incident has been analyzed and prioritized, the IR team should notify the appropriate departments/individuals. A thorough IR plan should already include the specific reporting requirements.
Step #3. Containment, Eradication, & Recovery
The purpose of the containment phase is to halt the effects of an incident before it can cause further damage. Once an incident is contained, the IR team can take the time necessary to tailor its next steps. These should include taking any measures necessary to address the root cause of the incident and restore systems to normal operation.
Develop containment, eradication, and recovery strategies based on criteria such as:
- the criticality of the affected assets
- the type and severity of the incident
- the need to preserve evidence
- the importance of any affected systems to critical business processes
- the resources required to implement the strategy
At all times, these processes should be documented and evidence should be collected. There are two reasons for this: one, to learn from the attack and increase the security team’s expertise, and two, to prepare for potential litigation.
Front Lines Report
Every year our services team battles a host of new adversaries. Download the Cyber Front Lines report for analysis and pragmatic steps recommended by our services experts.
Download NowStep #4. Post-Incident Activity
Every incident should be an opportunity to learn and improve, but many organizations give short shrift to this step. Adversaries are always evolving, and IR teams need to keep up with the latest techniques, tactics, and procedures.
A lessons learned meeting involving all relevant parties should be mandatory after a major incident and desirable after less severe incidents with the goal of improving security as a whole and incident handling in particular. In the case of major attacks, involve people from across the organization as necessary and make a particular effort to invite people whose cooperation will be needed during future incidents.
During the meeting, review:
- what happened and when
- how well the IR team performed
- whether documented procedures were followed
- whether those procedures were adequate
- what information was missing when it was needed
- what actions slowed recovery
- what could be done differently
- what can be done to prevent future incidents
- what precursors or indicators can be looked for in the future
The results of these meetings can become an important training tool for new hires. They can also be used to update policies and procedures and create institutional knowledge that can be useful during future incidents.